Commissioner Veto?

[MiNdHaBiTs]

Love for Cousins

I believe this is a somewhat fair trade because the team with Love has been dealing with injuries and can't handle another 6 weeks without Love. My only problem is the team with Cousins is in a dominating first place. 2nd place is 10 games back 3rd - 13, 4th 16. Point being if Love comes back and resembles anything like "Love" then we are all basically playing for second place.

Any other team I would not have cared.

I'm the commissioner. Should I intervene?

[Rizzo]

I think it is a legitimate trade. Love is injured for the 2nd time this year and the first place team is taking a calculate risk on this one. Also, you should never base your judgement on a trade by looking at the standings.

[PatriotsGirl]

I agree, seems fair to me.

[Muharem23]

Absolutely nothing wrong with this trade. Too many commissioners try to veto trades because they think one side wins big. Some players are injury prone (Love) and that has to be considered and if you're in a keeper league values can change quick. You might be winning the trade now and crying over it next season. Don't veto anything unless its outrageous (eg Lebron for Dunleavy) ...