Maybe I'm just not understand you guys, but I don't see what the real value is of the list. Want to explain it again, nice and slow?
Also 3 years seems like a very small sample size for this kind of analysis. No guarantee that, in my league, the #21 pick isn't made wrong, right? (I.e., someone stupidly picks Kyle Korver in the second round.) In which case the #21 pick could be much less valuable than #22. (Clearly with Korver it's obvious, but my larger point is that you can't count on the managers in any league to pick properly.)
Or does the fact that the list actually does go down consistently in numbers negate that point and prove it's robust?