2012/13 season discussion - Fantasy Basketball Cafe 2014
Fantasy Basketball Cafe


Return to FBC Salary Cap

2012/13 season discussion

Moderators: RedHopeful, silentjim, Fenris-77, DVauthrin, dasein

Re: 2010/11 season discussion

Postby Markos » Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:55 pm

dasein wrote:I'd suggest this: we get 2 extra roster spaces, but these are only to be used for inactive players. We know who a manager's inactive players are by having them displayed in the "smack talk" bar, which is highly visible and easily accesible.


That would probably work, not opposed to keeping the IL if we can do it in a way that Kal and Red are comfortable with.
Eradicating Marijuana one blunt at a time
Markos
High School Hoopster
High School Hoopster

User avatar

Posts: 289
(Past Year: 5)
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Home Cafe: Basketball
Location: Down Under

Re: 2010/11 season discussion

Postby Fenris-77 » Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:05 pm

Markos wrote:
dasein wrote:I'd suggest this: we get 2 extra roster spaces, but these are only to be used for inactive players. We know who a manager's inactive players are by having them displayed in the "smack talk" bar, which is highly visible and easily accesible.


That would probably work, not opposed to keeping the IL if we can do it in a way that Kal and Red are comfortable with.

Since this is exactly what I said, I'm going to agree. If we continue to list any players on the IL in the smack box I think it's a very manageable system.
Fenris-77
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
EditorCafeholicResponse TeamFantasy ExpertCafe WriterMock(ing) DrafterPick 3 Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 6300
(Past Year: 410)
Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Home Cafe: Basketball

Re: 2010/11 season discussion

Postby So-Tex » Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:16 pm

Fenris-77 wrote:
Markos wrote:
dasein wrote:I'd suggest this: we get 2 extra roster spaces, but these are only to be used for inactive players. We know who a manager's inactive players are by having them displayed in the "smack talk" bar, which is highly visible and easily accesible.


That would probably work, not opposed to keeping the IL if we can do it in a way that Kal and Red are comfortable with.

Since this is exactly what I said, I'm going to agree. If we continue to list any players on the IL in the smack box I think it's a very manageable system.

I'm fine with this as well. ;-D
Image
So-Tex
Head Coach
Head Coach

User avatar
Mock(ing) Drafter
Posts: 1039
(Past Year: 217)
Joined: 19 Aug 2009
Home Cafe: Basketball
Location: South Texas, USA

Re: 2010/11 season discussion

Postby RedHopeful » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:49 pm

Sigh - but I love the smack talk soooo much. }:-) :-B

Nah - it all sounds good to me especially the lottery ideas, Markos. Would love to see the playoffs expanded as well to keep interest levels. Kal - play with the settings and see if it works. If not, perhaps, we could split the league into 2 divisions and still achieve a similar result?
Image
RedHopeful
Moderator
Moderator

User avatar
ModeratorCafeholicResponse Team LeaderFantasy ExpertCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe MusketeerPick 3 ChampionLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 18235
(Past Year: 708)
Joined: 11 Jul 2007
Home Cafe: Basketball
Location: http://twitter.com/Redhopeful

Re: 2010/11 season discussion

Postby scully19 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 6:13 am

Man this draft USED to be moving along...
scully19
Head Coach
Head Coach


Posts: 1339
(Past Year: 197)
Joined: 8 Aug 2009
Home Cafe: Basketball

Re: 2010/11 season discussion

Postby RedHopeful » Sun Aug 29, 2010 5:46 pm

scully19 wrote:Man this draft USED to be moving along...

I'm assuming one of the problems is that not everyone is PM'ing the next guy...
Image
RedHopeful
Moderator
Moderator

User avatar
ModeratorCafeholicResponse Team LeaderFantasy ExpertCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe MusketeerPick 3 ChampionLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 18235
(Past Year: 708)
Joined: 11 Jul 2007
Home Cafe: Basketball
Location: http://twitter.com/Redhopeful

Re: 2010/11 season discussion

Postby scully19 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 5:49 pm

We're supposed to be PM'ing the next guy?
scully19
Head Coach
Head Coach


Posts: 1339
(Past Year: 197)
Joined: 8 Aug 2009
Home Cafe: Basketball

Re: 2010/11 season discussion

Postby silentjim » Sun Aug 29, 2010 5:50 pm

scully19 wrote:We're supposed to be PM'ing the next guy?


Should there be a missing smiley at the end of this? Or are you being serious?
Image
silentjim
Moderator
Moderator

User avatar
ModeratorCafeholicResponse TeamFantasy ExpertCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe MusketeerPick 3 Weekly WinnerMatchup Meltdown SurvivorLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 11486
(Past Year: 794)
Joined: 23 Jul 2005
Home Cafe: Basketball
Location: Fundamentals are the crutch of the talentless.

Re: 2010/11 season discussion

Postby scully19 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 5:56 pm

Being serious, didn't know we were supposed to, I haven't PM'ed anyone, and no one has PM'ed me.
scully19
Head Coach
Head Coach


Posts: 1339
(Past Year: 197)
Joined: 8 Aug 2009
Home Cafe: Basketball

Re: 2010/11 season discussion

Postby RedHopeful » Sun Aug 29, 2010 6:07 pm

scully19 wrote:Being serious, didn't know we were supposed to, I haven't PM'ed anyone, and no one has PM'ed me.

Lol - that's what I figured. In all message board drafts I have done, one always PM's the next guy. I wondered if this was going to be a problem when I noticed Kal didn't suggest this in the initial rookie draft post. O:-)
Image
RedHopeful
Moderator
Moderator

User avatar
ModeratorCafeholicResponse Team LeaderFantasy ExpertCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe MusketeerPick 3 ChampionLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 18235
(Past Year: 708)
Joined: 11 Jul 2007
Home Cafe: Basketball
Location: http://twitter.com/Redhopeful

PreviousNext

Return to FBC Salary Cap

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron
Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues




  • Fantasy Basketball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact