Well, running with 12 committed sounds ok to me. It's probably a better option than trying to fill 4 spots, annnnnd
making all the changes in less than a month. Maybe we wait till the end of the week and if haven't heard from these guys, we scrap their teams.
I've written up a fairly detailed proposal for the tiebreak system, with a worked example here:https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id ... Dpz1RnVlro
It's pretty much what Fenris proposed originally (I think) but with a bit more detail fleshed out. Have a read and see what you think. Keep in mind these questions, which are biggies.
1. Star player list from last year's results or this year's projections? (BBM per game in both cases)
2. Do we want the roster value tie break to favor the better roster (FA's behave like LeBron) or the weaker roster (promote competitve balance)?
3. How strong do we want bird rights to be (how easily do we want to be able to hold onto our stars)?