Is this veto?

[login]

I give up Kemba/D. Collison for his Wesley Matthews. Which side wins? Already got 3 objections.

[CatJ]

Which side depends on the league size and the WW, but that's not veto-able at all.

[baller crimson]

Is this a keeper? Though from the onset, no veto for me here...

[Muharem23]

Definitely NOT worth a veto in my book... It's proven worth vs prospect here. Some people put too much value on prospect. Collisson still has to prove himself in Dallas, and we don't know how Kemba will develop in Charlotte. Matthews is a fourth rounder but could get better as well..

Basically if you're in a 20 team league it's...

- a fourth rounder (plus if you're in a keeper league > one less player, so one round pick earlier)

For

- fifth and 6th rounder ...

If you're in a ten team league this translates to... 7th for 11th + 13th

Anyway it's a matter of opinion and valuation here... Not a terrible trade...

[Michael Jack-]

Regardless of any trade, any owner has the right to do what he or she wants with their team- Although most of us do enjoy the monetary value of fantasy sports, the sole objective is to have fun in our hobby- A trade should only be vetoed if it involves collusion- As cliche as it is, it always fits best. Say you are someone who hates a certain team and you drafted a player from that team out of need- So when someone offers you something you have to get what the league views as maximum value or the trade will get vetoed.. That's not very good form. So after that every time a trade is accepted it will no doubt automatically have two veto's right off the bat. See the pattern that will be created here.....

Think more than people over valuing it's the fact other owners forget this should be about fun and rooting for, trading for and drafting whoever you want... If you drafted Matt Ryan in the first round people would have called you a dolt... I drafted Chris Johnson in the first... Clearly I am the dolt! Though that homer falcon fan would be pretty happy with his first round pick so far- You need to implement a vetoing process so owners do have a chance to voice their opinion. Though, basically most veto's are based on personal opinion so having that not implemented would probably be not a bad way to go either... That's saying their is a great trust in your league of course-

[Fenris-77]

Most vetoes are based on fear and jealousy actually. Most of the time people just can't stand to see another team get better, especially teams near the top of the rankings. Sad but true.

And no, that trade isn't even remotely vetoable.

[spud_webb_04]

no veto

[Veldy]

not vetoable

[Kuji]

I wouldn't veto it

[mzu]

No veto in my mind either.